Here’s a great reason to make dwarfs planets too August 20, 2009Posted by Jorge Candeias in Definition of planet, Dwarf planets.
Tags: astrology, Definition of planet, Mike Brown, Mimas
add a comment
You know, Mike “Plutokiller” Brown estimates that there may be about 200 objects larger than 400 km in diameter in the Kuiper Belt, and guesstimates the number of similar objects beyond the Kuiper Belt to be around two thousand. He thinks all of these should be in hydrostatic equilibrium, and therefore should be considered dwarf planets. I’m not convinced (the smallest body actually known to be in hydrostatic equilibrium is Saturn’s moon Mimas, which is indeed about 400 km in diameter, but I think satellites will probably be found to have lower limits because tidal stresses should help gravity in the process of rounding them up; in the absense of these stresses, they won’t round up that easily), but I ain’t complaining. And I actually think that this should be a great reason to make all of them planets too. Or at least all of those that actually are in hydrostatic equilibrium.
You see, I’m sick and tired of astrological BS. And you just try to imagine the chaos astrologers would find themselves into if they had to deal with more than two thousand planets in order to make their so-called “predictions”. Ha! Wouldn’t that be a blast?
It would be worth it, just to make these guys’ lives considerably harder, methinks.
Disclaimer for the humour-impaired: this is a tongue-in-cheek post, not a scientific one.
Disclaimer PS: The part about Mimas is serious, though.